Someone replaced this page with the text from Wikipedia. Lots of times that's a good way to start an article so long as the irrelevant wiki links have been taken out. Wikipedia's content is free after all. However, this page already had a good start with original material created here. If someone thinks info from the WP article should be added here, please feel free to add it without replacing information. —Scott (talk) 20:02, 15 January 2008 (UTC)


When rewriting sections of an article, please remember to rework the deleted links into your new edit.

sec_1971 19:52, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Move Edit

I'd suggest move this page to "The Terminator (film)" since there are more than one "The Terminator" page. If no particular objection, the page will be moved after Aug 10, 2010. --TX55TALK 06:54, July 29, 2010 (UTC)

In my opinion, I would like to keep it with the parantheses... I think there is a discussion about using parantheses on article names. In my opinion its nice to have a clear distinguish of the name and "type", so we quickly can see what the article is about. Ascaaear 09:06, July 29, 2010 (UTC)
Main article: Talk:Terminator Wiki#Page moving and the disambig
You may not believe this TX, but I totally agree with this move! We've used this naming convention over at Xenopedia and it's probably kept us from totally losing our minds; for example: Alien (film), Aliens (film), Predators (film). I don't think it's necessary for the other films however, only the spin-off material (Example: "T3: Rise of the Machines" for the movie article, but "T3:Rise of the Machines (novelization)" for the novel.) I support this move!---CadmiumX99 05:24, August 4, 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for understanding. :D As for other franchises, they do still need a disambig tag since there too many spin-off materials. --TX55TALK 08:59, August 4, 2010 (UTC)
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.